Model Factsheets
| Name | Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables |
| Acronym | DIETER |
| Methodical Focus | None |
| Institution(s) | DIW Berlin |
| Author(s) (institution, working field, active time period) | Wolf-Peter Schill (DIW Berlin; Department of Energy; Transportation; Environment; working on the model since 2014), Alexander Zerrahn (DIW Berlin; Department of Energy; Transportation; Environment; working on the model since 2014) |
| Current contact person | Wolf-Peter Schill |
| Contact (e-mail) | wschill@diw.de |
| Website | http://www.diw.de/dieter |
| Logo | |
|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | The Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) has initially been developed in the research project StoRES to study the role of power storage and other flexibility options in a greenfield setting with high shares of renewables. Meanwhile, several model extensions have been developed and applied to different research questions. The model determines cost-minimizing combinations of power generation, demand-side management, and storage capacities as well as their respective dispatch in both the wholesale and the reserve markets. DIETER thus captures multiple system values of energy storage and other flexibility options related to arbitrage, firm capacity, and reserves. |
| Primary Outputs | Capacities, dispatch (and prices) |
| Support / Community / Forum | |
| Framework | |
| Link to User Documentation | http://www.diw.de/dieter |
| Link to Developer/Code Documentation | http://www.diw.de/dieter |
| Documentation quality | good |
| Source of funding | Various projects |
| Number of developers | less than 10 |
| Number of users | - |
| Open Source | |
| License | MIT |
| Source code available | |
| GitHub | |
| Access to source code | https://gitlab.com/diw-evu/dieter_public |
| Data provided | none |
| Collaborative programming |
| Modelling software | GAMS, Python |
| Internal data processing software | |
| External optimizer | |
| Additional software | |
| GUI |
| Modeled energy sectors (final energy) |
|
||||||
| Modeled demand sectors |
|
||||||
| Modeled technologies: components for power generation or conversion |
|
||||||
| Modeled technologies: components for transfer, infrastructure or grid |
|
||||||
| Properties electrical grid |
|
||||||
| Modeled technologies: components for storage |
|
||||||
| User behaviour and demand side management | DSM: Detailed representation of load shifting and load curtailment; "User behaviour": If this means empirically-founded behavioural aspects, the answer is no. | ||||||
| Changes in efficiency | Exogenous parameter assumptions | ||||||
| Market models | fundamental model | ||||||
| Geographical coverage | In most applications so far; focus on Germany; which is treated as one node; extended version with additional central European country nodes is available | ||||||
| Geographic (spatial) resolution |
|
||||||
| Time resolution | hour | ||||||
| Comment on geographic (spatial) resolution | DIETER's geographic scope and resolution tend to improve over time (as probably is the case for all models) | ||||||
| Observation period | 1 year | ||||||
| Additional dimensions (sector) |
|
| Model class (optimisation) | LP |
| Model class (simulation) | - |
| Other | |
| Short description of mathematical model class | Linear optimization model (usually cost minimization) |
| Mathematical objective | costs, (CO2 minimization has been implemented in an intermediate version, but is currently not operational) |
| Approach to uncertainty | Currently being developed (project LKD-EU) |
| Suited for many scenarios / monte-carlo | |
| typical computation time | less than an hour |
| Typical computation hardware | Runs on a standard PC |
| Technical data anchored in the model | - |
| Interfaces | None (we use GAMS GDX files and Excel) |
| Model file format | .gms |
| Input data file format | .xls |
| Output data file format | .gdx, converted to .xls |
| Integration with other models | |
| Integration of other models |
| Citation reference | Zerrahn, A., Schill, W.-P. (2017): Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: review and a new model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79, 1518-1534 |
| Citation DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.098 |
| Reference Studies/Models | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.205, https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.6.1.wsch, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-016-0174-7 |
| Example research questions | Which capacities of various flexibility / sector coupling options prove to be optimal under different shares of renewables, and what are their effects on quantities and prices? |
| Model usage | - |
| Model validation |
|
| Example research questions | Which capacities of various flexibility / sector coupling options prove to be optimal under different shares of renewables, and what are their effects on quantities and prices? |
| further properties | DIETER also includes reserve markets and stylized representations of solar prosumage, V2G, and various types of residential power-to-heat. Further power-to-x (hydrogen) details are currently being developed. |
| Model specific properties | Strengths: lean, computationally efficient, traceable; challenges: not as detailed and not as well-calibrated to present-day analyses as some other models |